| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "jonathan(at)allard(dot)io" <jonathan(at)allard(dot)io>, "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: json_populate_record |
| Date: | 2020-08-14 00:39:06 |
| Message-ID: | 538492.1597365546@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thursday, August 13, 2020, PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org>
> wrote:
>> It is not clear what the parameter `base` means
> I agree there is room for improvement here. The referenced note does’t use
> the term “base” which making finding the correct note among the various
> possibilities more difficult.
Yeah, that used to be pretty unreadable. I think the reformatting of
these tables that I did for v13 helps a lot, though:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-json.html
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan Allard | 2020-08-14 00:42:06 | Re: json_populate_record |
| Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2020-08-13 23:08:41 | Re: json_populate_record |