Re: WAL bandwidth

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL bandwidth
Date: 2014-05-22 19:37:59
Message-ID: 537E5217.20801@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 5/22/2014 12:31 PM, Torsten Förtsch wrote:
> That's what I want, to throttle the rate at which WAL is generated by
> maintenance operations.
>
> I take it, there is no such thing by now. Would it be a useful addition?
>
> I am not sure if I have the time to implement it. I have had a cursory
> look at the code before, just to find out how things work, but never
> changed something. What do you think, is it complicated to implement?

I suspect you'd need to A) add some SET variable(s) to control this, and
B) have the CREATE INDEX code sleep() some number of milliseconds per N
generated blocks of index, this would be akin to what vacuum and
autovacuum do now.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-05-22 19:52:28 Re: WAL bandwidth
Previous Message Torsten Förtsch 2014-05-22 19:31:39 Re: WAL bandwidth