Re: InitControlFile misbehaving on graviton

From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <bernd(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: InitControlFile misbehaving on graviton
Date: 2025-01-13 20:00:00
Message-ID: 53787654-d767-4790-84f0-07c424e91647@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Christoph,

13.01.2025 21:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Bernd and I have been chasing a bug that happens when all of the
> following conditions are fulfilled:
>
> ...
>
> It smells like graviton's arm9 isn't as backwards compatible to arm8
> as it should be. (But then I don't understand why disabling openssl
> fixes it.)

Very interesting! Maybe this can also explain weird leafhopper (which
uses graviton4, as Robins said) failures in the buildfarm. (I've
extracted diffs from the logs at [1] and brought Robins's attention to it
at [2].)

[1] https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Known_Buildfarm_Test_Failures
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/35d87371-f3ab-42c8-9aac-bb39ab5bd987%40gmail.com

Best regards,
Alexander Lakhin
Neon (https://neon.tech)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2025-01-13 20:09:54 Re: Incorrect CHUNKHDRSZ in nodeAgg.c
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-01-13 19:57:02 Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection