Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum
Date: 1999-08-13 17:37:19
Message-ID: 5375.934565839@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"G. Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu> writes:
> I tried the 'vacuum verbose analyze' again today. I get the same error
> with the AbortTransaction. There is a core file generated but no pg_vlock
> file. The core is over 1 Gig in size (38 Megs gzipped) so I'm not so sure
> you'd want to get that (you can have it if you want it though!).

It wouldn't do me any good anyway without a copy of the executable and a
copy of gdb built for whatever platform you are on. I was hoping you
could run gdb on the corefile there and just send the backtrace output
("gdb postgres-executable core-file" and then say "bt").

> Oliver Elphick (Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk) told me that this sounds
> like like a bug you patched for him a few days ago:

I doubt it's the same bug --- the error message generated by the other
bug was different...

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-08-13 17:50:43 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan?
Previous Message G. Anthony Reina 1999-08-13 17:28:10 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum