| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "G(dot) Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum |
| Date: | 1999-08-13 17:37:19 |
| Message-ID: | 5375.934565839@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"G. Anthony Reina" <reina(at)nsi(dot)edu> writes:
> I tried the 'vacuum verbose analyze' again today. I get the same error
> with the AbortTransaction. There is a core file generated but no pg_vlock
> file. The core is over 1 Gig in size (38 Megs gzipped) so I'm not so sure
> you'd want to get that (you can have it if you want it though!).
It wouldn't do me any good anyway without a copy of the executable and a
copy of gdb built for whatever platform you are on. I was hoping you
could run gdb on the corefile there and just send the backtrace output
("gdb postgres-executable core-file" and then say "bt").
> Oliver Elphick (Oliver(dot)Elphick(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk) told me that this sounds
> like like a bug you patched for him a few days ago:
I doubt it's the same bug --- the error message generated by the other
bug was different...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-08-13 17:50:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? |
| Previous Message | G. Anthony Reina | 1999-08-13 17:28:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum |