| From: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Edson Richter <edsonrichter(at)hotmail(dot)com>, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backups over slave instead master? |
| Date: | 2014-05-02 14:49:07 |
| Message-ID: | 5363B063.7020403@optionshouse.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 05/02/2014 09:46 AM, Edson Richter wrote:
> Yes, backup = pg_dump.
> Can I use it on slave even on 9.2.7?
Yes. The reason I suggested 9.3 was assuming you were using
pg_basebackup, rsync, or a similar tool to backup the database binaries.
You should be fine with pg_dump.
--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 800 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-676-8870
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com
______________________________________________
See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2014-05-02 17:12:56 | Re: Full text: Ispell dictionary |
| Previous Message | Edson Richter | 2014-05-02 14:46:16 | Re: Backups over slave instead master? |