Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful
Date: 2014-04-30 12:53:19
Message-ID: 5360F23F.8030404@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 04/30/2014 02:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/30/2014 01:27 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>>> ... so let's stop using that phrase, OK?
>>>> http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
>>>
>>> Shrug ... what I see there is a rant from a guy with no sense of humor.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> 'pfffft', I say.
>
> I wasn't sure if the whole article was a parody.
>
>

The rebuttal would be: "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful"
Considered Harmful.

Don't you just love recursion?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-04-30 12:55:44 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-04-30 11:18:07 Re: includedir_internal headers are not self-contained