From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql - additional extra checks |
Date: | 2018-03-20 12:35:19 |
Message-ID: | 535af7ee-1f4a-07bf-9c78-553dd895484f@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/20/2018 05:36 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2018-03-19 21:47 GMT+01:00 Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
> <mailto:tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking at the updated patch (plpgsql-extra-check-180316.patch), and
> this time it applies and builds OK. The one thing I noticed is that the
> documentation still uses the old wording for strict_multi_assignement:
>
> WARNING: Number of evaluated fields does not match expected.
> HINT: strict_multi_assignement check of extra_warnings is active.
> WARNING: Number of evaluated fields does not match expected.
> HINT: strict_multi_assignement check of extra_warnings is active.
>
> This was reworded to "Number of source and target fields in assignment
> does not match."
>
>
> fixed
>
OK, thanks. PFA I've marked it as ready for committer.
I think the patch is solid code-wise, but I'm sure it might benefit e.g.
from a native speaker checking the wording of comments and messages.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Rowley | 2018-03-20 12:41:02 | Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-03-20 12:31:56 | Re: [HACKERS] Add support for tuple routing to foreign partitions |