On 4/28/2014 1:26 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net
> <mailto:karl(at)denninger(dot)net>> wrote:
>
>
>
> Isn't WAL essentially sequential writes during normal operation?
>
>
> Only if you have some sort of non-volatile intermediary, or are
> willing to risk your data integrity. Otherwise, the fsync nature
> trumps the sequential nature.
>
That would be a "no" on the data integrity :-)
--
-- Karl
karl(at)denninger(dot)net