| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 |
| Date: | 2014-04-23 23:46:29 |
| Message-ID: | 535850D5.6080506@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/23/2014 01:06 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 23 April 2014 20:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>
>>> Logical Decoding begs the questions "of what?". Changeset Extraction
>>> is a better name.
>>
>> Changeset Extraction sounds too geeky to me. Let me try some
>> simplification of it. Why "set"? We capture each change; whether
>> together they form a set doesn't matter much. Also, since the changes
>> we're talking about occur in the stored data, I propose we use "Data
>> Change" rather than "Changeset". Also, why "Extract"? We're not
>> extracting these changes after the fact -- rather we capture them as
>> they transit through the WAL system.
>>
>> So, I would propose "Data Change Capture".
>
> How about "Change Streaming" ?
I like that one.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-04-24 06:32:18 | Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-23 22:39:52 | Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 |