Re: ecpg and bison again

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg and bison again
Date: 2002-06-19 16:35:46
Message-ID: 5358.1024504546@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is the problem that they C file will not have the proper timestamp?

Exactly. Don't you remember all the troubles we had back when we
did have the derived files in CVS? I don't want to have to deal
with that again, even for a short while.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-19 16:39:31 Re: ecpg and bison again
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-19 16:32:01 Re: COPY syntax improvement