Re: Using 9.3 as a slave to 9.1 for upgrade purposes

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Wells Oliver <wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Using 9.3 as a slave to 9.1 for upgrade purposes
Date: 2014-04-22 23:20:01
Message-ID: 5356F921.9070502@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 04/22/2014 03:52 PM, Wells Oliver wrote:
> As a way of upgrading, I'd like to setup a 9.3 cluster as a slave to a
> 9.1 master so that I can then promote that 9.3 instance to master, using
> streaming replication.
>
> Curious if this is a possible/advisable route.

Not possible with streaming replication. It is a binary format so the
version and system architecture have to be the same on both sides of the
equation. You would need to use another replication method, say
something like Slony. For more information see here:

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Replication,_Clustering,_and_Connection_Pooling

>
> --
> Wells Oliver
> wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:wellsoliver(at)gmail(dot)com>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message AI Rumman 2014-04-22 23:58:07 Is it good to have toast table for information schema table?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-04-22 23:12:13 Re: Using 9.3 as a slave to 9.1 for upgrade purposes