Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, girgen(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, ftigeot(at)wolfpond(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Date: 2014-04-22 05:36:26
Message-ID: 5355FFDA.7080903@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 04/21/2014 06:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
> If we never start we'll never get there.
>
> I can think of several organizations that might be approached to donate
> hardware.

Like .Org?

We have a hardware farm, a rack full of hardware and spindles. It isn't
the most current but it is there.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
Political Correctness is for cowards.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2014-04-22 05:47:28 Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD
Previous Message Noah Misch 2014-04-22 04:21:02 Re: Composite Datums containing toasted fields are a bad idea(?)