Patched odbc_dfw for PG >= 9.2

From: "Gunnar \"Nick\" Bluth" <gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de>
To: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: zhengyang4k(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Patched odbc_dfw for PG >= 9.2
Date: 2014-04-19 10:44:37
Message-ID: 53525395.3070501@pro-open.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Heillo,

after stumbling across compile errors for odbc_fdw I realised it was
still on the 9.1. level.

I've patched it, based on the tds_fdw code (so it's still read-only).

It does compile, and I think it is generally sane, however I'm _anything
but a C hacker_, so whoever feels confident enough please review this,
or even add the write capability :)

As I've been playing around with tds_fdw before and just wanted to see
if I can get around my encoding issues with odbc_fdw, I will not be able
to test it for a few days though.

It is available at
https://github.com/bluthg/odbc_fdw

According notes have been added to the Foreign_data_wrappers WIKI page
as well (no need for more people to try compiling it ;-).

Cheers,

--
Gunnar "Nick" Bluth
RHCE/SCLA

Mobil +49 172 8853339
Email: gunnar(dot)bluth(at)pro-open(dot)de
__________________________________________________________________________
In 1984 mainstream users were choosing VMS over UNIX. Ten years later
they are choosing Windows over UNIX. What part of that message aren't you
getting? - Tom Payne

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc Mamin 2014-04-19 11:49:23 Re: Could use some advice on search architecture
Previous Message Robin 2014-04-19 07:38:53 Re: Could use some advice on search architecture