Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DISCARD ALL (Again)
Date: 2014-04-18 16:44:48
Message-ID: 53515680.9040100@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 04/18/2014 08:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 4/17/14, 4:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> That we should also release the GD?
>
> In some cases, SD or GD are used to cache things. Having the connection
> pooler blow that away would defeat the point.

Not on a per session basis. Although I can see your point. The GD is
supposed to be global per session. If, I discard the session to it's
original state, that is going to predate the creation of the GD. That is
expected behavior.

JD

>
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
Political Correctness is for cowards.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-04-18 16:53:27 Re: How can we make beta testing better?
Previous Message Greg Stark 2014-04-18 16:43:08 Re: How can we make beta testing better?