On 09/04/2014 5:21 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:38:52AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>> The two * entries were produced by runs under SI, and confirm that
>> the rest of the system has not been slowing down nearly as much as
>> SSI. SI throughput dropped by 5% as the database quadrupled in size.
>> SSI throughput dropped by 23% during the same interval. And this was
>> actually one of the better sets of runs; I had a few last week that
>> dipped below 1ktps.
>>
>> I'm not sure what to make of this, thoughts?
> Seems it is time to ask on hackers.
Ack.