Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Date: 2006-08-01 14:35:57
Message-ID: 5345.1154442957@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Would this do the trick?

I think Bruce changed the call convention for run_diff ... are you
looking at CVS tip? Otherwise it looks reasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-01 14:41:44 Re: Hash indexes (was: On-disk bitmap index patch)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-01 14:12:01 Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2006-08-01 14:57:29 Re: [HACKERS] float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2006-08-01 14:25:52 better support of out parameters in plperl