Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bugs in TOAST handling, OID assignment and redo recovery
Date: 2018-04-12 00:23:31
Message-ID: 534158bd-1960-d921-ad36-ada97c2729a9@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 4/10/18 06:29, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> One of our 2ndQuadrant support customers recently reported a sudden rush
> of TOAST errors post a crash recovery, nearly causing an outage. Most
> errors read like this:
>
> ERROR: unexpected chunk number 0 (expected 1) for toast value nnnn

While researching this, I found that the terminology in this code is
quite inconsistent. It talks about chunks ids, chunk indexes, chunk
numbers, etc. seemingly interchangeably. The above error is actually
about the chunk_seq, not about the chunk_id, as one might think.

The attached patch is my attempt to clean this up a bit. Thoughts?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Clarify-TOAST-terminology-in-variables-and-error-mes.patch text/plain 5.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2018-04-12 01:34:30 Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-04-11 23:58:43 Re: submake-errcodes