Re: Re: [HACKERS] New parameter RollbackError to control rollback behavior on error

(2014/03/28 14:37), Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Inoue, Hiroshi <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> (2014/03/27 20:55), Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>
>>> (Moving back this thread to pgsql-odbc, so keeping a maximum of message
>>> history)
>>
>>
>> As for the patch in the original post,
>>
>> Is there any difference between rollback_on_error and
>> rollback_error_value except the naming?
> No differences. I just changed the name of this variable to be a
> maximum consistent with the parameter introduced.

There are some rollback_on_error in dlg_wingui.c.

>> The length of connection strings seem to be increased at least 3 bytes.
>> Is it right?
> Do you mean that with the introduction of the new parameter AA? If
> yes, well I guess it is increased by 5 bytes ";AA=[0|1|2]".

Isn't the difference between
A1=7.4;AA=[0|1|2] and A1=7.4-[0|1|2]
?
I introduced the latter only to skimp on 3 bytes.

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue