| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | ik(at)postgresql-consulting(dot)com |
| Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Johnston <polobo(at)yahoo(dot)com>, postgres performance list <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |
| Date: | 2014-03-25 15:22:55 |
| Message-ID: | 53319F4F.3000005@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On 03/25/2014 08:18 AM, Ilya Kosmodemiansky wrote:
>
> Joshua,
>
> that is really good point: an alternative is to use pg_basebackup
> through ssh tunnel with compression, but rsync is much simpler.
Or rsync over ssh. The advantage is that you can create backups that
don't have to be restored, just started. You can also use the
differential portions of rsync to do it multiple times a day without
much issue.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
Political Correctness is for cowards.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ilya Kosmodemiansky | 2014-03-25 15:29:11 | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-03-25 15:21:43 | Re: pg_dump vs pg_basebackup |