Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence
Date: 2014-03-25 03:51:07
Message-ID: 5330FD2B.908@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/25/2014 02:50 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> So instead of trying to handle this on the psql side[1], I think we need
> to handle it in the backend; specifically in the parser. Is there an
> easy way to get the parser to ignore the BOM character in the context of
> commands (but not in strings)?

I disagree. The server deals with SQL statements and client data
streams, it doesn't deal with files.

The BOM is an artifact of *files*. You don't expect to see a BOM in a
UTF-8 string passed to a function call in a library; nor should you
expect one to be passed to you on a network protocol that isn't about
exchanging files.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-03-25 03:53:14 Re: psql blows up on BOM character sequence
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2014-03-25 03:32:17 Re: [bug fix] PostgreSQL fails to start on Windows if it crashes after tablespace creation