| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Rajashree Mandaogane <rajashree(dot)28m(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: |
| Date: | 2014-03-21 01:56:15 |
| Message-ID: | 532B9C3F.3050309@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/21/2014 01:12 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rajashree Mandaogane <rajashree(dot)28m(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> While debugging any function in PostgreSQL, whenever I use the command
>> 'bt', it doesn't give the entire list of functions used. Which command
>> should be used instead?
>
> It's probably omitting functions that have been inlined; if so, the "fix"
> is to recompile with a lower -O level to prevent inlining.
For more details, see
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Developer_FAQ#What_debugging_features_are_available.3F
.
If you want to completely prevent inlining you can use -O0 instead of -Og .
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-03-21 02:26:47 | Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-03-21 01:28:13 | Re: QSoC proposal: Rewrite pg_dump and pg_restore |