Re: Replication slots and footguns

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Replication slots and footguns
Date: 2014-03-14 01:07:38
Message-ID: 5322565A.50001@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/13/2014 05:28 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Well we may have kind of hosed ourselves, because the in-memory data
> structures that represent the data structure have an in_use flag that
> indicates whether the structure is allocated at all, and then an
> active flag that indicates whether some backend is using it. I never
> liked that naming much. Maybe we should go through and let in_use ->
> allocated and active -> in_use.

Wait, which one of those does pg_drop_replication_slot() care about?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2014-03-14 02:41:26 Re: requested shared memory size overflows size_t
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-03-14 00:28:16 Re: Replication slots and footguns