From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jeffrey W(dot) Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o |
Date: | 2003-06-10 21:24:36 |
Message-ID: | 5321.1055280276@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
"Jeffrey W. Baker" <jwbaker(at)acm(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 23:08, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The first thing that comes to mind is that the thing is using SysV
>> semaphores as a substitute for spinlocks.
> It looks like a simple change in s_lock.h from
> #if defined(__i386__)
> to
> #if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> Will be necessary for this platform.
Cool. I assume it still passes regression tests and so forth?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sean Chittenden | 2003-06-10 21:25:49 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-06-10 21:22:28 | Re: [GENERAL] MySQL gets $19.5 MM |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-11 05:01:15 | GUC --- prevent non-super user changes |
Previous Message | Jeffrey W. Baker | 2003-06-10 21:15:58 | Re: Thousands of semops for every i/o |