Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Yeb Havinga <y(dot)t(dot)havinga(at)mgrid(dot)net>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Smith <greg(dot)smith(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views
Date: 2014-03-07 14:07:03
Message-ID: 5319D287.8090703@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/07/2014 09:33 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 11:02 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> The main known issue remaining is plan invalidation.
>
> I've pushed a version with a plan invalidation implementation. It's tagged:
>
> rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v9
>
> in
>
> git(at)github(dot)com:ringerc/postgres.git
>
> The invalidation implementation does not yet handle foreign key checks;
> that will require additional changes. I'll push an update to the
> rls-9.4-upd-sb-views and post an update later, at which time I'll rebase
> the changes back into the history.

Well, that was easy. Done.

rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v11

and rebased the rls-9.4-upd-sb-views branch to incorporate the changes.

The regression tests have further failures, but some are due to changes
in the inheritance semantics. I'm going through them now.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-03-07 14:11:47 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-03-07 14:02:41 Re: GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes