Re: Spinlocks on SGI's

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: bruc(at)acm(dot)org
Cc: lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Spinlocks on SGI's
Date: 2001-03-27 15:26:38
Message-ID: 5318.985706798@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

bruc(at)stone(dot)congenomics(dot)com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) writes:
> I contributed the first working s_lock.c code for the SGI's over three
> years ago (using the test_and_set library calls). It's been working
> for me ever since in a heavy multi-user environment. Please don't
> change it unless there's an overwhelming reason.

I don't believe anyone was proposing changing the existing __sgi code.
The discussion was about adding support for non-SGI MIPS hardware.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-27 15:33:23 Re: Re: Majordomo Delivery Error
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-27 15:06:20 Re: Spinlocks on SGI's