| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Date: | 2014-03-04 01:09:19 |
| Message-ID: | 531527BF.3000006@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2014 05:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Primary value is that in theory the hstore2 opclasses are available
>> *now*, as opposed to a year from now.
>
> Well, yes, that's right. Although we cannot assume that VODKA will get
> into 9.5 - it's a big project. Nor is it obvious to me that a
> VODKA-ized set of operator classes would not bring with them exactly
> the same dilemma as we now face vis-a-vis hstore code reuse and GIN
> operator classes. So it seems reasonable to me to suppose that VODKA
> should not influence our decision here. Please correct me if I'm
> mistaken.
I would agree with you.
Andrew was onsite with a client over the weekend, which is why you
haven't heard from him on this thread.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-03-04 01:15:41 | Re: Securing "make check" (CVE-2014-0067) |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-03-04 01:07:34 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |