| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Date: | 2014-03-04 00:57:09 |
| Message-ID: | 531524E5.5080005@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/03/2014 04:50 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I understand that there are ambitious plans for a VODKA-am that will
> support indexing operations on nested structures that are a lot more
> advanced than those enabled by the hstore operator classes included in
> these patches. However, surely these hstore operator classes have
> independent value, or represent incremental progress?
Primary value is that in theory the hstore2 opclasses are available
*now*, as opposed to a year from now.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-03-04 01:07:14 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2014-03-04 00:53:21 | Re: Securing "make check" (CVE-2014-0067) |