From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: How about a psql backslash command to show GUCs? |
Date: | 2022-04-11 20:11:22 |
Message-ID: | 531275.1649707882@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> My question is if we're only going to list out the settings that are
> customized, are we going to:
> 1. Hide a setting if it matches a default value, even if a user set it
> to be the default value? OR
> 2. Comment out all of the settings in a generated postgresql.conf file?
As committed, it prints anything that's shown as "source != 'default'"
in pg_settings, which means anything for which the value wasn't
taken from the wired-in default. I suppose an alternative definition
could be "setting != boot_val". Not really sure if that's better.
This idea does somewhat address my unhappiness upthread about printing
values with source = 'internal', but I see that it gets confused by
some GUCs with custom show hooks, like unix_socket_permissions.
Maybe it needs to be "source != 'default' AND setting != boot_val"?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | sirisha chamarthi | 2022-04-11 20:11:40 | Documentation issue with pg_stat_recovery_prefetch |
Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2022-04-11 19:45:59 | Re: API stability [was: pgsql: Fix possible recovery trouble if TRUNCATE overlaps a checkpoint.] |