Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1

From: Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1
Date: 2014-02-26 07:11:14
Message-ID: 530D9392.4090906@spg.schulergroup.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Hello,
Just to clarify my picture:

backend process:

tammer 12255262 13107322 0 07:52:10 - 0:00 postgres:
tammer regression [local] SELECT waiting

If I send a SIGINT (-2) to the backend process then this would
be equivalent to the SIGINT send by the SIGALRM handler?

Bye
Rainer

On 25.02.2014 19:47, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rainer Tammer <pgsql(at)spg(dot)schulergroup(dot)com> writes:
>> The semop() should be interrupted by SIGINT, right?
> Yeah. Note that we're expecting the SIGINT handler to do a longjmp,
> so that it doesn't matter whether or not the semop would choose to
> resume waiting after a signal. But it has to execute the handler.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rainer Tammer 2014-02-26 07:49:30 Re: Problem with PostgreSQL 9.2.7 and make check on AIX 7.1
Previous Message Patrick Wege 2014-02-26 07:00:10 Re: BUG #9308: The application failed to initialize properly