Re: pg_dumpall reccomendation in release notes

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall reccomendation in release notes
Date: 2014-02-26 00:08:59
Message-ID: 530D309B.9040206@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/25/2014 03:59 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we had a page discussing the pros and cons of different upgrade
> methods, yeah, I'd be in favor of reducing the release-note text to a
> pointer to that page. I don't see such a page in a quick skim of the
> fine manual's table of contents though?

I owe an update of
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/static/upgrading.html; I think I can
easily include a discussion of the various options there.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-02-26 00:28:46 Re: Bit data type header reduction in some cases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-02-25 23:59:35 Re: pg_dumpall reccomendation in release notes