Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: logical replication - still unstable after all these months
Date: 2017-06-02 20:29:00
Message-ID: 53081c5a-1156-a58a-b859-c01f4db0c8de@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/06/17 08:55, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 02/06/17 17:11, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
>> On 2017-06-02 00:46, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>>> On 31/05/17 21:16, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm seeing a new failure with the patch applied - this time the
>>> history table has missing rows. Petr, I'll put back your access :-)
>>
>> Is this error during 1-minute runs?
>>
>> I'm asking because I've moved back to longer (1-hour) runs (no errors
>> so far), and I'd like to keep track of what the most 'vulnerable'
>> parameters are.
>>
>
> Yeah, still using your test config (with my minor modifications).
>
> When I got the error the 1st time, I did a complete make clean and
> rebuild....but it is still possible I've 'done it wrong' - so
> independent confirmation would be good!

Well, I've seen this issue as well while I was developing the fix, but
the patch I proposed fixed it for me as well as the original issue.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-06-02 20:41:35 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2017-06-02 19:51:57 Re: TAP: allow overriding PostgresNode in get_new_node