Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 11:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hm, I don't much like having it silently ignore files that are present;
>> that seems like a foot-gun in the long run. What do you think of the
>> attached?
> That looks good to me. I have tried pretty hard to break it, but could not.
Pushed, thanks for testing!
regards, tom lane