Re: Bad sorting on source

From: Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad sorting on source
Date: 2014-02-18 14:32:17
Message-ID: 53036EF1.2090008@dalibo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On 02/18/2014 10:34 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc <mailto:stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>> wrote:
>
> On 02/18/2014 06:35 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote:
> >>
> >> Stupid question from someone not terribly familiar with Python
> frameworks -
> >> the installation instructions say "django *version 1.4*", is 1.4 a
> >> specific requirement
> >> or would later versions work? (I have 1.5.1 available right now).
> >
> > OK, it looks like 1.4 is needed, I get a "No module named
> simple" error
> > with 1.5.1.
>
> yeah - there is usually not a lot of testing done on newer/older
> versions of python/django than what is in Debian Wheezy (or rather
> Debian stable at a given time) because that is our deployment
> target for
> production.
> Needless to say that we will also take patches for making it work with
> newer versions as well to save us some time on the next upgrade ;)
>
>
> Absolutely. It's probably not a huge set of updates to work, but they
> do need to be done :) Of course, the next debian stable will have
> Django 1.6, so we're likely just going to bypass 1.5.
>
> And of course, any such patches need to be backwards compatible.

Perhaps a patch like the one attached should be applied?

--
Vik

Attachment Content-Type Size
djangoversion.patch text/x-diff 639 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2014-02-18 18:52:14 Re: Bad sorting on source
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2014-02-18 11:54:31 Re: Bad sorting on source