Re: Time for a new release?

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Time for a new release?
Date: 2014-02-13 11:50:49
Message-ID: 52FCB199.3010601@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Looks good to me, except that you don't want to merge the change to bump
the version number to 9.4-X to the REL9_3_STABLE branch.

On 02/13/2014 01:44 PM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Heikki
>
> I just created a PR https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/118 which will
> merge master into 93_STABLE can you look through it to make sure it's sane
>
> Dave Cramer
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 09:38 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> It's been a while since 9.3-1100, would it be time for a new minor
>>> release? In particular, some VMware people are eager to get the
>>> setQueryTimeout fixes (commit
>>> fa078d6390d8b1c95b63cb65a801272c6bce9244)
>>>
>>> Is there anything I can do to help with making the release?
>>
>> Please note that we are releasing new PG versions next week. It would be
>> very good if you do the JDBC release just before that, to help the
>> packagers' lives easier.
>>
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Devrim GÜNDÜZ
>> Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>> PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
>> Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
>>
>>
>>
>

--
- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2014-02-13 12:01:32 Re: Time for a new release?
Previous Message Dave Cramer 2014-02-13 11:44:03 Re: Time for a new release?