From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | AlexK <alkuzo(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Simple Web-based alternative to PgAdmin |
Date: | 2014-02-11 16:29:10 |
Message-ID: | 52FA4FD6.7050203@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 02/11/2014 08:17 AM, AlexK wrote:
> I would like to give my users the ability to invoke read-only functions and
> select statements, so that they can easily see the data. Both me and the
> users have experience mostly with SQL Server, so anyone can keep like 30
> connections without much thinking.
Trying to think why one person would need 30 connections to do simple
queries instead of running them through one connection?
>
> Since too many open connections seems to be a serious problem on PostgreSql,
> maybe giving everyone PgAdmin is asking for trouble. Instead, I would like
> to expose the data via some simple Web-based interface, managing the
> connections myself.
So have you seen a problem?
Also if you have, would it not be easier just to put a connection pooler
in front of the database? Say pgBouncer or pgpool, then you would be
covered for all methods of access.
>
> Can you recommend something very simple and light-weight, with only one
> feature: run a query and display a result set.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Simple-Web-based-alternative-to-PgAdmin-tp5791430.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2014-02-11 16:43:15 | Re: Simple Web-based alternative to PgAdmin |
Previous Message | alexandros_e | 2014-02-11 16:21:28 | Re: Simple Web-based alternative to PgAdmin |