| From: | Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views |
| Date: | 2014-02-11 10:05:50 |
| Message-ID: | 52F9F5FE.9050909@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2014-02-11 09:36, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 02/06/2014 10:19 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 02/06/2014 12:43 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> 1. Try (again) to do row-security in the rewriter. This was previously
>>> impossible because of the definition of row-security behaviour around
>>> inheritance, but with the simplified inheritance model now proposed I
>>> think it's possible.
>> Thanks to the simplified requirements for inheritance, this turns out to
>> be fairly easy. There's a version rewritten to use the rewriter in the tag:
>>
>> rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v6
>>
>> on https://github.com/ringerc/postgres.git
> ... which was totally wrong, and I blame lack of sleep for it ever
> getting pushed. I didn't understand the rewriter as well as I thought.
>
> v7 applies row-security quals in fireRIRrules .
> New tag:
>
> rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v6
Hi Craig,
This looks to be the same v6 version as the initial rewriter version.
https://github.com/ringerc/postgres/commits/rls-9.4-upd-sb-views-v6
regards,
Yeb
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2014-02-11 11:09:05 | Re: Row-security on updatable s.b. views |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2014-02-11 09:35:51 | Re: jsonb and nested hstore |