Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-09 13:10:45
Message-ID: 52F77E55.10202@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 02/09/2014 01:12 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
>
>
> On 09/02/2014 00:06, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 02/08/2014 05:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>>>> Though I'm not a MINGW expert at all, I know dllwrap is a deprecated
>>>> tool and dlltool is almost a deprecated tool. Cygwin port is removing
>>>> the use of dllwrap and dlltool now. Isn't it better for MINGW port to
>>>> follow it?
>>> Only way to make that happen is to prepare and test a patch ...
>>
>> Yeah. Incidentally, we didn't quite get rid of dlltool for Cygwin. We
>> did get rid of dllwrap. But I agree this is worth trying for Mingw.
>>
>
> we should have get rid of dlltool on cygwin.
> At least it is not used on my build
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
>
>

The send in a patch. The patch you sent in previously did not totally
remove it IIRC.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-02-09 13:33:59 Re: [HACKERS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2014-02-09 12:32:54 Re: gaussian distribution pgbench