From: | "Albe Laurenz" <all(at)adv(dot)magwien(dot)gv(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane *EXTERN*" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: AIX shared libraries (was Re: [PATCHES] Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries) |
Date: | 2006-09-12 16:11:28 |
Message-ID: | 52EF20B2E3209443BC37736D00C3C1380A51744E@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>> The natural way in AIX would be:
>> - Create libpq.so
>> - Create libpq.a by 'rm -f libpq.a; ar -rc libpq.a libpq.so'
>> - Install only libpq.a
>
> Hm. This seems possible with some moderate hacking on Makefile.shlib
> (certainly it'd be no more invasive than the existing Windows-specific
> platform variants). However, looking at what's already in
> Makefile.shlib for AIX makes me doubt the above claim a bit, because
> AFAICS libpq.so is produced from libpq.a on that platform. Is it
> possible that the rules have changed across AIX versions, and that the
> code in there now is needful for older versions?
I don't think that this behaviour has changed. I remember it from
AIX 4.3.2.
Of course libpq.so is created from (the static) libpq.a.
But once you have the dynamic library, you can link statically
against it.
> Another issue with installing only .a is that there's no provision
> for versioning in .a library names ... what happens to someone who
> needs two generations of libpq on his machine?
Use different directories and set LIBPATH?
I don't know if there is a canonical way to do that. I'll investigate.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jie Zhang | 2006-09-12 16:17:30 | Re: Bitmap index status |
Previous Message | Strong, David | 2006-09-12 15:46:19 | Re: Lock partitions |