Re: WITH ORDINALITY planner improvements

From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "'Greg Stark'" <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WITH ORDINALITY planner improvements
Date: 2014-02-03 02:50:36
Message-ID: 52EF03FC.2010200@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(2014/02/01 8:01), Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 07:25:17PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated version of the patch. In that version the code for the
>>> newly added function build_function_pathkeys() has been made more simple by
>>> using the macro INTEGER_BTREE_FAM_OID.
>
>> Is this patch to be applied?
>
> It hasn't been reviewed AFAIK.

Thanks for picking this up.

I think it doesn't need to be reviewed anymore because the same feature
has been commited in [1] if I understand correctly.

[1]
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/E1Vjel1-0007x9-TR@gemulon.postgresql.org

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashesh Vashi 2014-02-03 03:10:27 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2014-02-03 01:59:35 Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow