On 01/02/2014 23:27, Tom Lane wrote:
> Marco Atzeri <marco(dot)atzeri(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Eventually it was assumed that size of a wide char is always 32 bit ?
>
> Hm. It looks like there's an entirely unnecessary assumption that wchar_t
> and wint_t are the same width. Does the attached patch make things better
> for you?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
tested on 9.3.2 with LANG=en_US.UTF-8
tsearch ... ok
Thanks
Marco