From: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative |
Date: | 2017-08-03 21:26:01 |
Message-ID: | 52ED3987-CF1C-412E-8595-5168213F5C4C@yesql.se |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 03 Aug 2017, at 19:27, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> In https://postgr.es/m/69DB7657-3F9D-4D30-8A4B-E06034251F61@yesql.se I
>> presented a WIP patch for adding support for the Apple Secure Transport SSL
>> library on macOS as, an alternative to OpenSSL. That patch got put on the
>> backburner for a bit, but I’ve now found the time to make enough progress to
>> warrant a new submission for discussions on this (and hopefully help hacking).
>>
>> It is a drop-in replacement for the OpenSSL code, and supports all the same
>> features and options, except for two things: compression is not supported and
>> the CRL cannot be loaded from a plain PEM file. A Keychain must be used for
>> that instead.
>
> Is there a set of APIs to be able to get server certificate for the
> frontend and the backend, and generate a hash of it? That matters for
> channel binding support of SCRAM for tls-server-end-point.
I believe we can use SSLCopyPeerTrust() for that. Admittedly I haven’t looked
at that yet so need to get my head around channel binding, but it seems to fit
the bill.
> There were no APIs to get the TLS finish message last time I looked at OSX
> stuff, which mattered for tls-unique. It would be nice if we could get one.
Yeah, AFAICT there is no API for that.
cheers ./daniel
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2017-08-03 21:32:35 | Re: Hash Functions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-03 21:09:41 | Re: Hash Functions |