commit fest 2014-01 week 2 report

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: commit fest 2014-01 week 2 report
Date: 2014-01-29 22:20:57
Message-ID: 52E97EC9.90509@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Last week:

Status Summary. Needs Review: 66, Waiting on Author: 16, Ready for
Committer: 9, Committed: 20, Returned with Feedback: 2. Total: 113.

This week:

Status Summary. Needs Review: 49, Waiting on Author: 18, Ready for
Committer: 9, Committed: 33, Returned with Feedback: 3, Rejected: 1.
Total: 113.

I wrote to all patch authors who didn't sign up as reviewers yet, and a
number of them signed up. Several asked me for beginner-level patches
to look at, but it seems we're all out of beginner-level patches this time.

A lot of patches don't have any reviewer yet, for the same reason.

I reminded all reviewers to send in their first review. In the past, we
would soon start unassigning inactive reviewers, but seems a bit futile
here, for the reason above.

So while there is decent progress, you can do your own math about where
this is likely to end. There are a lot of complex patches under
consideration, and we might have a painful end game.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2014-01-29 22:37:48 Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-29 21:59:30 Re: Suspicion of a compiler bug in clang: using ternary operator in ereport()