| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Union-ifying RangeTblEntry |
| Date: | 2014-01-28 06:18:04 |
| Message-ID: | 52E74B9C.6010107@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi all
I'm about to have to add _another_ flag to RangeTblEntry, to track
row-security expansion.
In the process I noticed the comment:
/*
* XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be
* merged into a union. I didn't do this yet because the diffs
* would impact a lot of code that is being actively worked on.
* FIXME someday.
*/
and it struck me that the end of the 9.4 commitfest might be a
reasonable time to do this now that PstgreSQL is subject to "pulsed"
development with commitfests.
As part of that, a number of the flag fields on RangeTblEntry into a
bitfield.
Comments?
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-01-28 06:33:54 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Keep pg_stat_statements' query texts in a file, not in shared me |
| Previous Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2014-01-28 06:17:25 | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |