Re: new json funcs

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: new json funcs
Date: 2014-01-24 21:26:42
Message-ID: 52E2DA92.1020609@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/24/2014 12:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/24/2014 03:40 PM, Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> For consistency with the existing json functions (json_each,
>> json_each_text, etc.) it might be better to add separate
>> json_to_record_text and json_to_recordset_text functions in place of
>> the nested_as_text parameter to json_to_record and json_to_recordset.
>>
>>
>
> It wouldn't be consistent with json_populate_record() and
> json_populate_recordset(), the two closest relatives, however.
>
> And yes, I appreciate that we have not been 100% consistent. Community
> design can be a bit messy that way.

FWIW, I prefer the parameter to having differently named functions.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-01-24 21:29:45 Re: Standalone synchronous master
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2014-01-24 20:59:35 Re: new json funcs