From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Gregory Smith <gregsmithpgsql(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.4] row level security |
Date: | 2014-01-24 03:15:36 |
Message-ID: | 52E1DAD8.30909@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/24/2014 10:12 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> (Re-sending; I forgot to cc the list)
>
> On 01/20/2014 02:15 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 01/20/2014 09:58 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>> As it is I'm spending today reworking the RLS patch on top of the new
>>> approach to updatable security barrier views.
>>
>> To get that rolling I've split the RLS patch up into chunks, so we can
>> argue about the catalogs, ALTER syntax, and the actual row-filtering
>> implementation separately ;-)
>>
>> It's currently on git(at)github(dot)com:ringerc/postgres.git in the branch
>> rls-9.4-split, which is subject to rebasing. I'm still going through it
>> making sure each chunk at least compiles and preferably passes "make
>> check".
>
> That branch is now pretty stable, and passes checks at every stage up to
> the new RLS regression tests. I've pushed a new version to branch
> rls-9.4-split. Further updates will rebase this branch.
>
> The tag rls-9.4-split-v5 identifies this particular push, and won't get
> rebased away.
Pushed a new rebase to the main working branch, merging in the fixes I
made to KaiGai's patch last time.
Tagged rls-9.4-split-v6
I haven't bothered with a patchset for this one, I'll be replacing it
again soon. This is just for anybody following along.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-01-24 03:22:51 | Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-01-24 02:52:52 | Re: Change authentication error message (patch) |