Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Date: 2014-01-23 22:55:24
Message-ID: 52E19DDC.4090304@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/23/2014 02:17 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> FWIW, I have a patch around somewhere that I never cleaned up properly for
> submissions that simply added a counter to pg_stat_user_tables indicating
> how many times vacuum had aborted on that specific table. If that's enough
> info (it was for my case) to cover this case, I can try to dig it out
> again and clean it up...

It would be 100% more information than we currently have. How much more
difficult would it be to count completed autovacuums as well? It's
really the ratio of the two which matters ...

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2014-01-23 23:12:54 Re: Why do we let autovacuum give up?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-23 22:52:40 Re: [bug fix] pg_ctl always uses the same event source