From: | Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information |
Date: | 2014-01-21 02:02:06 |
Message-ID: | 52DDD51E.2080408@fuzzy.cz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.1.2014 19:30, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>
> Attached is a yet another version, with more bugs fixed and more
> comments added and updated. I would appreciate some heavy-testing of
> this patch now. If you could re-run the tests you've been using,
> that could be great. I've tested the WAL replay by replicating GIN
> operations over streaming replication. That doesn't guarantee it's
> correct, but it's a good smoke test.
I gave it a try - the OOM error seems to be gone, but now get this
PANIC: cannot insert duplicate items to GIN index page
This only happens when building the index incrementally (i.e. using a
sequence of INSERT statements into a table with GIN index). When I
create a new index on a table (already containing the same dataset) it
works just fine.
Also, I tried to reproduce the issue by running a simple plpgsql loop
(instead of a complex python script):
DO LANGUAGE plpgsql $$
DECLARE
r tsvector;
BEGIN
FOR r IN SELECT body_tsvector FROM data_table LOOP
INSERT INTO idx_table (body_tsvector) VALUES (r);
END LOOP;
END$$;
where data_table is the table with imported data (the same data I
mentioned in the post about OOM errors), and index_table is an empty
table with a GIN index. And indeed it fails, but only if I run the block
in multiple sessions in parallel.
regards
Tomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shigeru Hanada | 2014-01-21 02:44:16 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2014-01-21 01:42:09 | Re: inherit support for foreign tables |