Re: currawong is not a happy animal

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: currawong is not a happy animal
Date: 2014-01-17 17:50:10
Message-ID: 52D96D52.1000605@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 01/17/2014 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> It looks like what we need to fix the immediate problem is to mark
>> set_latch_on_sigusr1 with PGDLLIMPORT. Is that the only one of these
>> symbols we might need to make visible?
> We've generally relied on the buildfarm to cue us to add PGDLLIMPORT.
> Add that one and see what happens ...
>
>

OK, done.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2014-01-17 17:55:05 Re: currawong is not a happy animal
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2014-01-17 17:44:43 Minor improvements to sslinfo contrib module