Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?
Date: 2014-01-16 01:46:43
Message-ID: 52D73A03.4060508@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/15/2014 5:37 PM, Lists wrote:
> it's clearing out the cruft that results from creating temp tables,
> loading a bunch of data, then dropping the table,

there shoudl be zero cruft. when the table is dropped, it should pooferate.

--
john r pierce 37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2014-01-16 02:09:08 Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-01-16 01:46:19 Re: vacuum vs pg_repack for clearing bloat?