From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: extension_control_path |
Date: | 2014-01-14 18:25:24 |
Message-ID: | 52D58114.9090202@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But you can have a single $SHAREDIR per set of executables, right?
>
> Please read the following email to know what they asked for and how they
> do operate OpenShift:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/341087492.2585530.1376776393038.JavaMail.root@redhat.com
FWIW, I'm talking with Amazon later this week and checking how they're
handling their tenant-loadable extensions. I'd like to come up with one
solution here which covers all cloud providers.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2014-01-14 18:32:12 | Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2014-01-14 18:14:14 | Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance |