Re: extension_control_path

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: extension_control_path
Date: 2014-01-14 18:25:24
Message-ID: 52D58114.9090202@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> But you can have a single $SHAREDIR per set of executables, right?
>
> Please read the following email to know what they asked for and how they
> do operate OpenShift:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/341087492.2585530.1376776393038.JavaMail.root@redhat.com

FWIW, I'm talking with Amazon later this week and checking how they're
handling their tenant-loadable extensions. I'd like to come up with one
solution here which covers all cloud providers.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2014-01-14 18:32:12 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-01-14 18:14:14 Re: [Lsf-pc] Linux kernel impact on PostgreSQL performance